Adam Neely, well known jazz composer in NYC, offers an interesting video, “Can I Pass an AP Music Theory Exam?”
I never knew there was such a thing, but I suppose conservatories give them.
The video plays some tunes and expects the applicant to score the theme in Avid Sibelius, so that is an ear training test. Then the applicant must note the appropriate chord symbols, according to late 18th Century rules. In the last exercises the applicant must fully harmonize a melody.
From my own years of piano, I don’t really know the chord symbols, but the ear portion I could do.
Neely notes that the accepted practice is different in jazz and wonders about putting everyone through the harmony rules of, say, Mozart’s Requiem.
There is a case for saying music education ought to present the structures, rhythmic and harmonic practices of other cultures. Is the “Germanic” version of western music “racist” or judgmental in specifying rules as to how dissonance should resolve (and which French impressionism broke before expressionism did).
Neely has previously discussed microtones, as well as the controversies over “equal temperament” vs. “just intonation”. Philip Clark has a 2013 Grammophone article on the controversy, “The tuning wars: ‘Equal temperament destroys everything”.. Some older organs in Europe have extra half-keys for other intonations (for “justice”) which will certainly preserve key personalities.
Earlier posts from Blogger about these matters are no longer available, but I’ll try to provide more coverage of artistic issues like this in due course (as well as “polarization” in our society and politics).
(Posted: Friday, May 27, 2022 at 2 PM EDT by John W Boushka)
“The Invisible Men”, 66 min, directed by Yaris Mozer, from Journeyman Films, Mozer, and Lev films, with the subtitles “Gay and Palestinian In Israel: Living Under The Radar”, appears on the Real Pride YT channel (April 2022), and it presents a little covered problem. Gay men are often targets for religious-based persecution, even familial execution (“honor killings”), in some communities in Israel’s Occupied Territories on its West Bank, and cannot legally enter Israel.
Despite a relatively liberal policy on LGBT rights in Israel, the situation on the West Bank, underscored by Islam, is usually very hostile. And Israel appears, according to the film, to have no policy of asylum for LGBT persons from the West Bank, simply because of its embed into larger security concerns over any Palestinians on the West Bank (as possible “trojans”), aggravated probably by Israeli West Bank settlements, which have been morally controversial for years.
It’s interesting that Israel, with its compulsory military service for both sexes, has accepted open gays in the military since the 1990s, long before the US was able to abandon its “don’t ask don’t tell” policy in 2011.
The film traces the lives of three gay Palestinian men, Louie, Abdu, and Fares. Most of the attention is given to Louie, 33. He does odd jobs off the books to survive illegally in Tel Aviv, but has to stay out of sight of police. He spends some time in the Jaffa area. At one point he goes to a hidden disco party, barely visible to filmmakers.
Louie (and then the others) apply for asylum. After some setbacks, at the end Louie finally gets asylum in a northern European country (probably Sweden) and starts a new life.
Here is a 2015 video, 5 min, from CNN Business, “Gay 24-year-old: I’ll be deported, then killed”. Living in Edmonton. Alberta, Canada wanted to deport him because before coming to Canada he had literally been a member of Hamas as part of his family. According to comments, he was eventually resettled in America.
I looked into the possibility of hosting an (LGBT) asylum seeker(s) (working with DC Center Global) starting in the summer of 2016 when I was still living in an inherited house in Arlington VA. This possibility remained active until the spring of 2017 (after Trump took office) but it turned out I downsized and sold out in the fall of 2017. Things have changed since then (the pandemic for starters) but later on I’ll give more details on exactly why I have handled certain things the way I have.
Generally, religious or tribal subcultures with a history of difficulties of survival themselves tend to be more likely to be vitriolic with homophobia, which, however masked by religious dogma, represents a concern that the tribe will not be able to continue reproducing itself.
Now UkraineTakeShelter, started by two students at Harvard, would match perspective hosts to refugees from Ukraine, and there are some coming to the United States. It is unlikely that a smaller one-bedroom condo would be suitable in most cases. With refugees (as opposed to asylum seekers) social service organizations and congregations usually try to raise money to place families in new apartment complexes. (As of May 26 the site reports an “issue with Google”, not sure what that is about.)
(Posted: Thursday, May 26, 2022 at 12 noon EDT by John W. Boushka)
OK, coming back home from an unusual vacation in remote areas in the SW, I’ve got some news to cover or opine on.
The news about monkeypox was promulgating the day I arrived in Dallas and then set out into the countryside. It wasn’t as easy to keep up as usual.
I think the best presentation so far is NYC’s lung doctor Mike Hansen, so well known for his videos of Covid, May 24, 2022. He says he has not seen interpersonal spread like this before.
Medcram (Roger Seheult) has a video May 23.
NBCNews offers an AP storydiscussing two gay male fetish raves in Spain and in Belgium. There is even a quarantine of some people in Belgium. Dylan Housman had penned a provocative story for Daily Caller May 20.
UK Pink News has some explainers (by Patrick Kelleher), referring to information from Grindr.
When I was hearing the story break, my first reaction was to connect the dots with the recent scuffle in the Supreme Court, and the leak of Alito’s opinion (focused on abortion) undermining the idea of (not) finding modern “fundamental rights” to bodily privacy in the US Constitution. The reports on monkeypox at gay events might underline the notion, advanced in the 1980s, that the “chain letter” aspect of gay male sex could eventually prove dangerous to society as a whole (through increasing immunosuppression allowing other diseases to incubate – and that idea has been mentioned with Covid) or the speculative idea that the disease could mutate to become more contagious. The religious right tried (unsuccessfully) to pass a draconian extension of the Texas sodomy law back in 1983 (before the HIV virus was identified), when I was living in Dallas and could follow the news from my apartment in Harvey’s Racquet (at the time). Possibly, one could argue, states could start passing sodomy laws again and then force a new challenge to Lawrence v. Texas (2003) in SCOTUS (although Alito warns near the end of the leaked draft, don’t count on it).
The raves would have presented the opportunity for skin-skin contact, not necessarily sexual or genital. The same sort of thing could have well happened in heterosexual parties. So I would now think that the incidence in gay men may be circumstantial, and may not hold up over time. Similar observations (in general) might have applied to Zika virus (but that is an arbovirus) a few years ago, where the most noticeable tragic result applied to serious birth defects in children from mothers who acquired it in pregnancy.
The issue of the smallpox vaccine is significant. CDC has an information page last updated in 2019. I would check back here as it will probably be reupdated soon. Routine vaccination for smallpox stopped in 1972. I have a very small smallpox scar myself.
COVID19 has an epidemiology that is almost opposite from AIDS. While at first we were hyperscared of surfaces and hand hygiene issues, the biggest problem seems to be aerosols with more prolonged exposure. Practical observations suggest that people living in congregate households are much more vulnerable to serious disease (in any age) than people living alone. It seemed to go “against family values”. Omicron, which arrived mysteriously (maybe from one immunocompromised person, or maybe from another animal reverse crossover) is almost another virus COVID21.
My own hunch is that those fully vaccinated and boosted who then get a “mild” infection with Omicron probably do have pretty good practical immunity and can be out in public without much risk, as long as they have intact immune systems. Covid is turning into an “opportunistic infection”. I tend to agree with Chris Martenson and others that properly run trials of Ivermectin have not really been done, and this could still turn out to become a reliable treatment if allowed to.
Bloomberg sums it up in a May 15 article by Naomi Kresge “How Omicron Infection Turbo-Charges Vaccinated People’s Immunity”, link (paywall). This News/Medical Sciencespaper seems significant.
Do we know for sure about how people with fleeting breakthrough Omicron will fare over time? Not with absolute certainty. Maybe long Covid will still be a problem with those with a tendency toward other autoimmune disease. Can repeated mild infections cause immune suppression? Is there “original antigenic sin?” We are not completely sure yet. But we are not seeing people with past Covid develop the secondary opportunistic infections (like PCP) that happened three decades ago with AIDS.
As a whole, Covid has refocuses some moral thinking, about the idea of “carrying” a virus that will not seriously hurt the infected person but which can jeopardize others more vulnerable (the original “Typhoid Mary” problem — she got locked up for years because of her danger to “contaminate” others, almost the thinking we see in China today with its Zero Covid). Here’s a related perspective by Matthew Crawford on a UK “conservative” site called the UnHerd: “Covid was libearlism’s endgame”.
I wanted to take a “non position” on the furor of school boards and “don’t say gay” bills.
First, I tend to look at both sexual orientation and gender dysphoria as a set of inclinations, desires, and sometimes “chosen” behaviors. I don’t think of myself or as others in my cohort as a group or pseudo-enthnicity. That is true even when these “traits” may have genetic or epigenetic explanations in many people. Gender dysphoria in small children does happen but is quite rare (like one in several hundred) and I can’t believe it is appropriate to belong in lower grade school curricula, especially in conjunction with “indoctrination” as part of Social and Emotional Learning. But I also don’t think states should pass laws against it. School boards and active parents should work this out. Parents need to run for school boards.
In my own childhood, I developed dyspraxia, which is thought (in boys) to be associated with Asperger’s or “mild” autism. I was “teased” for my inability to compete like a normal male physically. That came to a head when I was assigned to Special Training Company for a few weeks during Army Basic in the spring of 1968 at Fort Jackson SC. Possibly measles in 1950 before my seventh birthday contributed to this. But I don’t think this makes me into a separate intersectional group of “people”.
I do like the idea of using new singular pronouns for persons or animals when non-binary or, more commonly, gender is unknown (that is, instead of “he or she”). I think the Left does not like singular pronouns for non-binary persons because the singularity reinforces individual “failure” to conform. Nevertheless, there is no reason why individual non-binary persons will not be “good at things” (like changing their own tires or oil, for example) in prepper-like situations.
Indeed, much of the cultural debate over gender identity (which is overrunning – like rain on top of snow — the previous historical controversies about sexual orientation [that is, over not having one’s own kids and maybe over public health] has to do with the idea that non-binary persons often don’t satisfy the yearning of others to see sexual attractiveness (of either gender) in a conventional way.
(Posted: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 at 1 PM EDT by John W. Boushka)
On Friday, May 20, 2022, ABC 2020 presented a two hour mystery “Double Life Double Murder”. The viewing link (may require cable subscription) is this, and ABC main article is this. ABC affiliate WFAA has a detailed article. I actually watched it in a motel in Amarillo TX ( 8 PM Central) on a road trip.
This is the case of a middle-aged couple, Dennis and Norma Woodruff, shot and stabbed late on a Sunday evening Oct. 16, 2005. The couple had been downsizing by moving from a home in Heath, near Lake Ray Hubbard in the eastern suburbs of Dallas (which tend to be more conservative than the rest of the area – I lived in Dallas 1979-1988) to Royse City, farther into Collin and Hunt counties along I-30.
Their 18 year old son Brandon apparently had dinner in their new place with them early Sunday evening and then says he was in a gay bar before returning to college at Abilene Christina University. Other friends tried to call them and they did not answer. Their bodies were found on Tuesday.
There seems to be very little physical evidence. Some time later a knife would be found with Dennis’s blood on it, maybe from a previous cut.
Nevertheless Brandon would become the main person of interest and then suspect, mainly from circumstantial evidence, although there seems to be serious questions whether the proposed timeline could have happened.
There is a paperback book by Phillip Crawford, “Railroaded: The Homophobic Prosecution of Brandon Woodruff for His Parents’ Murders”, Amazon Create Space, 2018, 161 pages, Site stripe link.
The Dallas Voice, article by David Taffett, reviews the episode with details of the case here. The Innocence Project is looking into this. Brandon’s grandmother supports his claims of innocence and has funded appeal attempts. The 2020 episode features a detailed interview of a near middle aged Brandon by ABC journalist John Quionenes where Brandon insists he did nothing. The episode included interviews with a female juror who insisted there was no homophobia in the deliberations although several jurors tended to see homosexuality per se as a (religious) sin.
I was just on a brief trip to Dallas and then several surrounding places (actually three other states). The Cedar Springs area close to downtown has rainbow paint on the main intersection (at Throckmorton St) and has some of the largest gay bars in the nation (Station4 disco [previously the Village Station] and Roundup, the latter a country-western place that is busy even on weeknights). Reasonably secure lot parking is available for $5 weekend nights. I did not have time to visit Royse City but it appears from Google Maps to be an upscale bedroom community like many in north Texas. Here is a Wikipedia picture of main street. Here is a picture of the Jacob’s Dream statue at Abilene Christian University.
I also did not have time to revisit Ranger, TX on I-20 (where the highway “climbs” on top of the Palo Pinto “Mountains”) which had serious fire damage last March (local Fox video). I did see grass fire damage on NM 406 (near the Oklahoma Panhandle Black Mesa) but there was no place to stop and film it. More details about the trip will be forthcoming.
On Monday, May 16, 2022, PBS Independent Lens presented the documentary by Jared Jakins, “Scenes from the Glittering World”, about life in a public school on a Utah Navaho reservation, one of the most remote schools in the US, for three indigenous teenagers: Noah Begay, Llii Neang, and Granite Sloan. There are two other filmmakers: Roni Jo Draper, and Scott Christopherson. The original film (available for rental on Amazon for $5.99 (Stripes text), original distributor Soro Films) was reduced from 76 minutes to 56 minutes by PBS Independent Lens. I wish PBS wouldn’t condense and manipulate the opening of movies it shows (link). The film was shot with a wide aspect ratio.
There is a white older male teacher who tries to impress on the students that future generations depend on what they do. Sometimes the kids are absorbed by modern “glittering” gadgetry (like computer games like Fortnite) living in shacks. There is a moment where the controversy over introducing LGBTQ identities is mentioned. The communities have faced dire danger from Covid because of the particular lack of immunity in some indigenous tribes as well as diabetes from American diets.
The scenery is often breathtaking. In one scene, the very distant San Francisco Peaks in Arizona apparently loom in the far distance. The rocky formations in the scenery look almost like alien cities.
I also wanted to share the summer 2021 video from Engineering Made Easy, “11 Dimensions Explained” (23 minutes).
The video hints at the “powers” that a conscious agent living with access to more (string theory) dimensions would have. I included it because it just might be, at least in some science fiction scenarios, a key to “greater than c” space travel by jumping in and out of other metaverses. I may need this idea later for my novel “Angel’s Brother” which is undergoing some restructuring because of current events.
(Posted: Tuesday, May 17, 2022 at 11 AM by John W Boushka)
Review of book “The Cold Civil War: Overcoming Polarization, Discovering Unity and Healing the Nation”. (Amazon Sitestripes link).
Author: Jim Belcher, formerly president of Providence Christian College in Pasadena CA and founding lead pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church in Newport Beach CA. Ph.D from Georgetown University.
Foreword by John D. Wilsey.
Details: 2022, Intervarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL. 340 pages hardcover, 274 of main text, with three parts, thirteen chapters, and a conclusion. Endnotes.
The author tackles the “cold civil war” between animus-bearing portions of US society, and certainly would agree that democracy as we know it is in danger. His conclusion (spoiler) is that religion, both as an interfaith effort and in his purview a Christian priority, needs to stand with the political order in bringing about reforms. However, he does not go into the legal details of the reforms (such as how to shore up election integrity and the loopholes and imbalances in our democracy, which seem to favor rural and smaller places).
He presents the core of his argument pictorially on p. 37 with a kind of Nolan chart (remember “the world’s smallest political quiz”). It is bounded by a square with Left and Right, and with Order and Freedom as the other two edges. There are three concentric circles that pass through each quadrant. 3 is the most extreme, 2 is closer to the ruling establishment, and 1 is presented at the end as his proposed center, which will comprise four souls: Freedom Left becomes the constitutional soul, Order Left becomes the republican soul, Freedom Right becomes the middle class soul, and Order Right becomes the statesman soul.
Chapter 12 is “Patriotic Citizenship” and Chapter 13 is called “Christianity: The Second Constitution”. He argues that Christianity provides a “soft” but stable, appropriately flexible (and non-denominational but essentially western derivation from what Christianity added to Judaism in his view) set of moral principles to evolve constitutional principles as technology overwrites older ways of doing things. That claim in interesting to me personally because Chapter 6 of my first DADT book had proposed specific constitutional amendments to add to the Bill of Rights, as a Bill of Rights 2. Admittedly, since this dates to about 1997 (when my own mainframe I.T. career was in its full maturity according to the world then) some of the proposals are outrun by history. And that’s the problem with my trying to make such specific prescriptions and why some sort of systemic approach is needed. (Ironically I talked about the first amendment and about bodily privacy a lot, and even the beginnings of “freedom of reach”, but not about the second amendment).
Belcher is most graphic in describing extremism on all sides. He winds up forcing to conclude that the far Left, with the doctrine of anti-racism interpreted as required indoctrination (and now it seems that “critical gender theory” has sometimes joined the indoctrination when SEL is implemented in some school systems), becomes as authoritarian as the far Right. They have both evolved into anti-individualism and hyper tribalism. In fact, I think we need a book, or at least an essay, on “individualism v. tribalism”. Probably Dave Rubin would be a good starting point for that effort (book “Don’t Burn this Book” Thinking for Yourself in an Age of Unreason”, 2020, Sentinel, Amazon stripes link). Belcher points out that the extreme Order Right is willing to use violent or illegal means to get what it wants (January 6, and all the “stop the steal” business) but doesn’t get into the specific weaknesses (like the Electoral Count Act of 1887 which definitely needs revision). The far Left, however, is at least willing to disrupt individuals and small businesses with violence and vandalism in demands for tribute (well, Marxist revolution).
The moral common denominator seems to be how individuals see themselves, how they balance their own utility with greater common good. As one of the videos below shows, this comes up with some social issues in rather obvious ways: abortion, vaccination, and end-of-life (as in the Catholic video below), but in some other ways to. Think about the loss of freedom and implicit sacrifice in the coronavirus lockdowns, and in conscription (just of men?). Public health particularly pits individual autonomy against the good of the larger community as a whole (and this could have been said about the AIDS crisis in the 80s, which was very different from COVID).
Authoritarian systems limit the individual by requiring “em” to personally identify with tribal priorities. Marxist systems pretend that everyone should start out equal and that belonging to a victimized class is a legitimate source of personal identity. Far right (“alt-right”) authoritarianism assumes that a ruling class comprises inherently “superior” people entitled to rule, and follows survival of the fittest (except inside the nuclear or extended family or inner tribe). However often a far-right “order” mentality appeals to the notion that its tribe had one time been abused. This is certainly true in the Old Testament with the Israelites.
(Posted Monday, May 16, 2022 at 1 PM EDT by John W Boushka)
I’ve noticed recently that journalists and writers normally refer to fully “transitioned” transgender adults (mostly male to female) with the feminine (she, her, hers) pronouns when describing their lives before transition, as well as referring to them by their new names when referring to pre-transition life history.
They also refer to the person with the new (or current) name when describing the past.
In past blog posts, I have sometimes referred before-transition incidents with the previous names and pronouns. I now wonder of this would be considered misgendering or deadnaming, even when writing about past events.
This whole question leads me to present a couple other videos and incidents.
Let’s look at Johnny Harris’s video of May 10, 2022, “Why He Matters: The Danger of Ignoring Julian Assange”. Harris starts out by describing Assange’s “escape” to the embassy of Ecuador in London and hiding out in that confinement for seven years, before he gets into the actual leaks that got him “into trouble”, especially regarding information stolen by Chelsea Manning about the Iraq war. Well, in fact, one of these was a forty-minute video of an American accidental war crime that I even carried on one of my Blogger blogs since April 2010 (until I closed it down in Jan. 2022). It is called “Collateral Murder” and cannot now be embedded (age restriction from YT).
Harris always refers to Manning as Chelsea and doesn’t convey the fact that the soldier then was Bradley Manning, legally male at the time when the leaks from the Iraq war started. According to Wikipedia, Manning announced she was transgender in 2013, and completed transition surgery, litigated when she was an inmate, in 2018. Manning had considerable grass roots protester-type support for recognition of her transition as early as 2013, but the gay press did not cover her case very much because of political opposition to “Bush’s war”.
This leads my discussion to recalling the legal battle over Manning’s imprisonment for refusal to appear to a grand jury later in 2019. Ford Fischer covered a lot of this for News2Share when other media outlets pretty much ignored it. The Wikipedia article covers it. I have a couple videos I took myself of the demonstrations outside the federal courthouse in Alexandria, VA in the good old days of March 2019. I plan to edit and combine these into more professional videos later this summer, as I plan with some of my other mini-video sets (like on “stop the steal”).
I can digress here one more time on Harris’s video, noting one conspicuous blue tattoo on one inner forearm (shows up later in the video). Why does he disfigure himself? (He never impressed me as someone who would “need” body art.) I love the orange beanie cap (as if paying homage to Tim Pool, but Harris has is own video style that adds a lot of in-the “visually compelling”-field fact finding to his subject matter, more than Pool usually does in his volume of Timcasts.) Max Reisinger may well be on the path to developing a Harris-style reporting presence as he finishes his gap year.
Toward the end, Harris notes that “journalists” as such are not a legally recognized category with legal privileges (although there are such things as press passes). Journalism carries with the expectation of objectivity and intellectual honesty, which is both a duty and a privilege. That gets dicey when someone (like me) does journalism for self-expression, but is not willing to bond with others in a supposed marginalized group for organized “activism”. More about that is to come.
I’ll wrap up this one by making note of the Netflix film “Untold: Caitlyn Jenner”, directed by Chrystal Moselle. This is part of Netflix’s “Untold” streamed film documentary franchise. It had been reviewed on the “Media Commentary” site that has been sunset. Again, journalists usually refer the Caitlyn as “she” for the entire life, although sometimes they will say “previously known as”, as with Chelsea. It’s interesting that she wants to run for governor as a Republican and has some pretty sensible ideas as to how to prevent the GOP’s converting itself into ordered (or actually chaotic) fascism. As I recall, Caitlyn refers to her earlier male life in the third person, as a real person in the past. Time, after all, is a dimension.
(Posted: Sunday, May 15, 2022 at 1 PM EDT by John W. Boushka)
“Pray Away” (2021, an abbreviation of “pray away the gay”), directed by Kristine Stolakis and streamed on Netflix (101 minutes) traces the history of the ex-gay movement through the eyes of its practitioners. At the beginning and end the film warns that “conversion therapy” has been discredited by medicine and is often outlawed.
The film focuses particularly on Exodus International (which started in 1978 and dissolved in 2013), along with groups like Love won Out, Living Hope, and Focus on the Family. There is particular attention to the career of John Paulk. The early scenes in the film feature 1980s meetings in Reno and at nearby Lake Tahoe, a curious location.
The movements tended to be characterized by aggressive behavior or the ex-gay proponents “ministering” to others about “God’s law” and finding salvation through ‘Him”. There seem to be a particular attention in certain evangelical communities to religion as the center of life, without much other explanation. I’ve always thought it was a bit of a paradox that the Savior is presented as an attractive young and athletic white male, when hero-worship or idolization (particularly) is sinful (or violates one of the Commandments ).
I was familiar in the late 1980s with another group called “Love in Action” which was said to emphasized “giving up the gay lifestyle” while at the time offered services to AIDS patients.
Of course many societies (such as radical Islam) have condemned homosexuality on supposed theological grounds and gone out of their way to persecute it.
Many societies are heavily tribal and are concerned about their collective survival in future generations. Particularly today (as in Russia), homosexuality would be seen as a threat to a group’s maintaining enough fertility (and it gets into ethno-racism with ideas like replacement theory).
On the other hand, some indigenous societies have recognized non “reproductive” individuals as a kind of separate priesthood but sometimes do not allow them full personal freedom but expect them to take care of others (such as with eldercare).
Much of our moral code has to do with prohibiting activities which are harmful. But some of our code demands participation in activities seen as essential to survival of the group (start with conscription). This is another side of moral thinking.
The film did not particularly focus on AIDS and gay men in the 1980s, and the right wing did. I talked about this a lot in Section 7 of Chapter 3 of my first DADT book.
This would be a good place to present a video “Born This Way: The Science Behind Being Gay” from Real Pride, June 2021, 46 minutes. (It had been linked on a site now taken down, but now linked here in the non-WP portion of the new site.) The video presents the theory of epigenetics (later born sons) and the idea that the X chromosome could carry a gene that makes women more fertile if they have two copies but that could interfere with heterosexual desire in males, possibly increase fertility for the whole tribe.
I do want to share a couple short videos from a day trip.
In this one I briefly discuss what I have found about SEL, or Social and Emotional Leaning programs getting put in by school systems in lower grades.
In this one I talk about “metaversal rights” and whey you have to be prepared to “fight”.
(Posted: Friday, May 13, 2022 at 3 PM by John W. Boushka)
I want to share the video “Beginner v. Pro Composer: Can You Hear the Difference?”
23-year old Dutch composer Frank Rener has composed a waltz-like movement for woodwind quintet, for his girl friend Leka. It runs about 5 minutes and could have been conceived as a movement of a multi-movement work. It is in G Major.
British Composer David Bruce “rewrites” it with a few changes. He gradually increases the combinations and registers of instruments during the exposition section. He varies the passage work style and makes it a little more contrapuntal, with more augmentation and embellishment, in the B and C sections before the return to the initiation section, making it more story-like. He does say that most composition is like “storytelling”.
Frank and Leka travel to London to hear a professional consort play the revised composition.
My own “Third Sonata”, completely sketched and maybe 80% entered into Sibelius, is more in line with his recommendations than any of my early work. But I started composing the Sonata in Dec. 1961, after my own William and Mary expulsion, while at home, waiting to start at GWU. It is a long journey. It is mentioned in my latest screenplay effort inspired by the incident (and my DADT books), “Williamsburg and Charlotte, which I presented at the recent Author Solutions Pitchfest.
I could mention a 2010 composition by Timo Andres “It Takes a Long Time to Become a Good Composer“, for solo piano, based on Schumann, which I heard premiered in NYC on December 11, 2010, a few days before my own mother’s passing, writeup. (Well, it does take a long time.)
One other thing: I made an errand in the Ballston Quarter today when I returned and setup a position (Two Knights Defense), where Black is winning:
A young man came by and “challenged” me to a game. I had the W pieces. A spectator crowd accumulated as it started to rain. Here was the final position (recreated at home):
Final position, back rank threat? Or does the pin win for W?
Recently the mainstream media have reported numerous protests near the homes (DC area) of US Supreme Court justices in light of the Politico leak of Justice Alito’s draft of an opinion (from February) that would reverse Roe v. Wade (after almost 50 years).
Numerous observers have also noted that protesting loudly near a SCOTUS Justice’s home is illegal, under US Code 18 paragraph 1507 (Cornell Law), which makes it an offense to picket or parade at a judge’s residence or business (although not outside a large government building like SCOTUS) with the intention of changing an outcome (the same applies to picketing jurors). That may be one reason why grand jury proceedings are in secret.
Washington Post columnist notes all this with an op-ed (paywall) by Marc A. Thiessen, May 10, “Protesting at justices’ homes is illegal. What is Biden doing about it?”. Guest articles about this question have shown up in my mail inbox.
I want to pose another question. If I went to film it (not participate) but then post it on social media, should it be taken down (especially if livestreamed)? Would that violate a TOS rule?
If a “legitimate” media company does it to report the news, that is one thing. But does the First Amendment protect my right to do this as an amateur however gratuitously as a form of self-expression? You can, normally, after all, videotape the police (and it’s a good thing a teenager did at the Floyd incident in Minneapolis).
Maybe the critical issue would be, does the content creator do this for a living (and can ‘e’ show it with accounting?)
I’m presuming that the content creators or videographers did not participate in the protest by carrying a sign or screaming in unison themselves. That makes it a “skin in the game” kind of problem, which is particularly how the “Left” sees it. This reflects back to the reasons for my own web simplification, which I’ll get into more detail later.
(Posted: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 at 9 PM EDT by John W. Boushka)