“DO ASK, DO TELL IV”, MORAL REDUX, PART 3
MARCH 15, 2016 LEAVE A COMMENT EDIT
Before getting more specific as to how these ideas apply to individual s like me, let me present this chart:
There is a related posting on Blogger March 2 which credits the original Vox essay Feb. 5, 2016 by Emily Ekins and Jonathan Haidt on Moral Foundations Theory, especially as it relates to the moral view of people who support Donald Trump compared to the other more mainstream candidates.
(Note: I will recode the html for this 7 column table later when there is more time.)
Moral cat antonym Consol cat color candidate Nolan chart comment
caring harm empathy blue Sanders, Clinton(somewhat less) liberal but sometimes communitarian tends to stress groups, sometimes faith-based fellowship, too
individual fairness cheating, mooching proportionality green Cruz, Rubio conservative to libertarian personal responsibility an absolute
liberty oppression personal freedom orange Paul, Cruz and Kasich less so libertarian to classically liberal emphasizes personal autonomy, choice
loyalty betrayal hierarchy red “The Donald” Trump authoritarian us v. them, belonging to the group
authority subversion hierarchy red Vladimir Putin authoritarian, both in communism and fascism military values
sanctity degradation, desecration hierarchy red Huckabee authoritarian/fascism but curiously relects self-expression “body fascism” paradox; also, often tied to religions fundamentalism
(Continuing with the post text):
On March 15, David Brooks, in the New York Times, developed this theme further with an essay, “The Shame Culture“, having nothing to do with shamans. Paul Rosenfels has said “shame” is a feminine emotion, “guilt” is masculine. Brooks connects shame to the group, guilt to the individual. But individualism is as likely to be feminine as masculine; it is more a matter of having an unbalanced personality.
(Published: Tuesday, March 15, 2016, at 1:30 PM EDT)
DADT IV